By Australian Newsletter

Agenda-driven activism has subverted the teaching of Australian history at the nation’s universities, with gender, race and class politics dominating two-thirds of subjects on offer.  Australian history is no longer taught as a study of past events, according to a report by the Institute of Public Affairs.  It argues students are more likely to be exposed to disconnected themes, or “microhistories”, presented through the lens of identity politics, than key concepts explaining Australia’s development as a modern nation.  An audit of the 147 Australian history subjects offered across 35 universities showed 102 were preoccupied with identity politics. Of those, 13 subjects were solely focused on gender and sexuality, race or class.

ANU’s Sexuality in Australian History examined “how an understanding of sexual diversity in the past can illuminate current debates in Australian society”.  Monash University’s History of Sexuality 1800 to the Present had topics that included “the construction of masculinity and femininity, courtship and marriage, heterosexuality and homosexuality”.  In comparison, four subjects featured democracy as a major theme, three covered industrialisation, and capitalism was the focus of just one subject.  Prime ministers appear to be largely overlooked, but Queensland senator Pauline Hanson is mentioned in the descriptions for three subjects.

The report’s author, Bella d’Abrera, said the audit highlighted that students were not being taught basic concepts explaining the origins of Australian society, including its successes as a modern nation.  She said historians had instead “recast themselves as political activists” and students were being “politicised in the classroom” as a result of the courses that were available to them.  “Historians occupy a special position because they have a unique ability to shape our society and to shape the future, but they should not attempt to rewrite the past,” Dr d’Abrera said.

“By reframing Australia’s past using the lens of identity politics, they are warping history to fit their own agenda.”  The report highlights how indigenous history has been framed around common themes of resistance, colonisation and the frontier wars.  Twenty-nine of the 57 indigenous history subjects offered focused on indigenous-settler relations “in terms of violence and conflict rather than co-existence and co-operation”.  Dr d’Abrera said many Australian history subjects were better suited to the disciplines of politics, sociology or anthropology.

She said there was a dearth of subjects that discussed Australia’s economic and political development since 1788 and only one subject looked into the cultural conditions in Britain that led to the development of our liberal democracy.  No subject mentioned “the fact the Australian nation had benefited enormously from the Western legacy”, Dr d’Abrera said.  She said this shed new light on the opposition that the Ramsay Centre has come up against in its bid to establish degrees in Western civilisation at several Australian universities.

After rejection by ANU and a push-back from academics at the University of Sydney, the Ramsay Centre recently signed up the University of Wollongong as a partner for a course and scholarship program planned to launch in 2020.

Bachelor of Arts student Oscar Green took the University of Queensland’s The Australian Experience during his first year of study expecting to be introduced to issues around Australian history and culture.  Instead he was disappointed by a “disproportionate focus” on race and gender and “revisionist approach” to studying the past.  A Victorian university student says her education is being “suffocated” by identity politics, revealing that she was instructed to use the adjective “enslaved” instead of the noun “slave” and was marked down for referencing a quote featuring a racial slur in a historical essay.

Theodora Pantelich recently completed her first year of a bachelor of arts degree in history and Russian at the University of Melbourne, and was surprised by the influence of identity politics in her course.  “When I began to study history at university, I was surprised that it was being taught through the lens of identity politics,” she said.  “Rather than teaching students factual information, lecturers seem more concerned with approaching their analysis of history from Marxist perspectives.  “The obvious problem with this approach was that this leads to a total abandonment of objectivity, with historical facts being viewed merely as constructs rather than self-evident truths.

Source: Compiled by APN from various reports

Print This Post Print This Post



By Australian Newsletter

Let us pray that Vote Frauds do not interfere with future federal & state elections.  The means to fix Vote Frauds became available with the publication on 5 December 2018 of the Parliamentary committee report on the subject.  There are two recommendations that are of particular interest in addressing the problem of vote fraud.  Recommendation 12 requires Voter ID, and would require amendment to the Commonwealth Electoral Act, which will be difficult in the short time available, with less than 10 sitting days before the expected May federal election.

Recommendation 25 requires the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) to electronically link polling booths to the central Electoral Roll so as to stop “Multiple Voting” at different polling booths in much the same way that Bank ATMs are linked to a central Bank account to stop you withdrawing the same cash at two or more different ATMs.  Implementing this requires the cooperation of the AEC in the short time available.  It can be done, if there is the political will and determination within the federal Government to make the AEC perform.  It was done in South Africa in a short time 20 years ago by a computer engineer now working in North Sydney.

As well as praying, you could lobby any coalition MPs or Senators that you know and urge them to urge the PM to adopt Recommendations 12 and 25.  Quite possibly many coalition MPs and Senators might be unaware of this report as it was released on the second last day of sitting last year.

Source: National Alliance of Christian Leaders

Print This Post Print This Post



By Australian Newsletter

The Australian Christian Lobby warns that the consequences of legalising Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Queensland are far-reaching and still considerably unknown.  Recently it was reported that two doctors and a psychiatrist could face jail after a Belgium court ruled that in 2010, they diagnosed a 38-year old woman with autism so that she could be euthanised.  “This is the second case to make international headlines with Dutch authorities prosecuting a doctor for drugging an elderly patient’s coffee.  The doctor then asked family members to hold down the struggling woman while injecting the lethal drug,” commented ACL’s state director Wendy Francis.

“Cases like these show the dramatic change in attitude towards patients and care when euthanasia is legalised.  When death becomes a legal form of care the value for life is greatly diminished.  The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety serves as a reminder that there are grave issues with the treatment of elderly people already.  If physician-assisted suicide becomes a valid form of care, it will only serve to complicate an already flawed system” Francis said.  The Australian Christian Lobby will continue to urge the Queensland government to protect vulnerable people by considering additional funding for palliative care services and aged care facilities.

Source: Australian Christian Lobby 

Print This Post Print This Post



By Feature Articles

As we approach another election and the debate heats up, many Australians despair of our future, with good reason.  Research shows that we are distressingly distrustful of one another, of our once-revered institutions, and of governments and politicians in particular.  Furthermore, we are polarised as perhaps never before as social activists, infused across our society, dominate much of today’s divisive public discourse.  The advent of social media has provided a rudimentary global public square, which Australians have taken to using with enthusiasm.  However, the level of abuse, emotion, hatred and splintering that it is producing has led economic historian Niall Ferguson to observe that it is so destabilising it may yet render our societies ungovernable.

Yet there is little narrative around the major and very threatening challenges confronting us.  Economic and geopolitical, these are largely external to our country, but the threats are real and blind to our tribalism.  They demand a recognition of our shared interests, and national unity, if our complacency in confronting them is not to destroy our cherished freedom, harmony and prosperity.  Only when we identify the serious need for a national response to the challenges will we be able to leave behind the attacks we seem to be conducting on one another.

The first challenge is the inevitable global economic downturn, next time Australia will not be immune.  The debt crisis that went within an ace of collapsing the global economy a decade ago has not been resolved.  It has been kicked down the road by vast new levels of public debt, running at unprecedented levels in the West.  We sailed through the past event because of extraordinarily sound public finances, care of the Coalition government, and because China, relatively unaffected at that time, continued buying many of its raw materials from us.

Although significant progress has been made by this government in winding back our annual deficits, we have a debt-to-GDP ratio of about 30 per cent in net terms, not comparable to the horrific debt problems of the US and Europe but fast approaching the point at which they lost control of their economies a decade ago.  Therefore, economic management is an absolute priority.  We want the strongest and most resilient economy we can manage, securing jobs and opportunities, and able to pay for the services and infrastructure that we expect.

Another challenge, and increasing the likelihood of economic trauma, is our move to a completely new global power setting.  We complacently believe the dominance of the West, and in particular its leadership, both economic and military, by the US, will secure our stability and safety.  For the first time we no longer can take for granted that the most powerful nation will necessarily be able to come to our aid, or maintain global order in the event of adventurism by one or more of the new troublesome power centres such as Russia, Iran or North Korea.  Nor can we take lightly the possibility of miscalculation between the reigning superpower and the rising superpower.

It is high time we found a deep sense of national unity and common purpose for the sake of peaceful harmony and co-operation as a people.  Although it has been hardly reported or analysed in Australia, the Americans have effectively signalled a new cold war with China.  Their trade war with China is under way but this is about a great deal more than the belief, both by Republicans and Democrats, that the Chinese are not trading fairly.

Vice-President Mike Pence has charged China with stealing US commercial secrets on an industrial scale, meddling in US politics, seeking influence in US institutions such as universities and engaging in debt-trap diplomacy with the Third World to gain global influence and displace America, particularly from the western Pacific.

We simply are not prepared to cope with these extraordinary new dynamics.

Every major country in the region, including Australia, does more trade with China than it does with the US, and that trade is critically important to global prosperity, including our own.  Yet, strategically, China is boldly flexing its muscle, including in the South China Sea, where it has built military bases in contested waters aimed at controlling the world’s most important sea lanes, and key western approaches to Taiwan, Japan and Korea.  It is plainly seeking to displace the US, with which we are so aligned, as our region’s major power.

This is not just a change in the “software” of international trade and relations in our area, it is a change in the “operating system”.  It poses enormous challenges, the likes of which we have not seen since the 1940s.  If we get this wrong, we will end up poorer, weaker, fragile and more vulnerable.  In the face of this, we need to have a sober, mature and foresighted debate about what is truly important to us, about what makes us different and sets us apart.  In any contest, you need to know what you mean to keep; what’s not negotiable.  But we’re not having that debate; instead, we’re pretending that everything will go on as usual.

This complacency is evident in the decade spent struggling to sign contracts for 12 submarines that we are told are such a vital deterrent.  At the earliest, the first may reach us by the middle of the 2030s, the last perhaps in the 2050s.  It was seen as a priority in 2009, making it all the more staggering that there has not been greater urgency recently, given the dramatic change in our strategic environment.  Perhaps an even more frightening reflection of our complacency is that we have not built the strategic fuel reserves that we committed to having in place under the terms of the International Energy Agency.

We have little liquid fuel self-sufficiency any more, and 40 to 45 ships are heading towards Australia at any given time carrying the vital fuel supplies that are absolutely critical to the functioning of our economy.  Many of those ships pass near the southern end of the South China Sea, where the potential for miscalculation, or worse, cannot be discounted, with an interruption to shipping leaving Australia almost crippled within a matter of days.  It is high time we found a deep sense of national unity and common purpose for the sake of peaceful harmony and co-operation as a people.

It also happens to be the case that these great issues before us must be, and can be, the clarion call for the redevelopment of a commitment to the common good, and the restoration of our trust in and regard for our freedoms, and the institutions that underpin them.  I believe thinking Australians would agree that these are the most pressing issues to address at the next federal election.

Source: John Anderson former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia and Leader of the Nationals from 1999 to 2005.  His Conversations series, made up of video discussions about pressing issues, with opinion leaders from Australia and abroad, can be found at

Print This Post Print This Post



By Australian Newsletter

Recent drug-related deaths at festivals over the recent holiday period have renewed the push for pill testing in Australia.  The Australian Christian Lobby notes that drugs are inherently unsafe regardless of whether or not they have been tested.  For example, 15-year-old Anna Wood died from ecstasy not because it was tainted, but because of the idiosyncratic effects of any illicit drug.  Illicit drugs remain illegal and should be treated as such by governments and by the police.  Not enforcing the law sends a message, especially to young people, that drug-taking is both dangerous and foolish.

Testing a pill creates a permission structure for consumption of the pill, thereby giving implicit approval to dangerous and irresponsible behaviour which no careful parent would wish their child to partake in.  In any event, as with most ‘harm minimisation’ systems, it is unlikely that pill testing would have the benefits claimed by advocates.   Research conducted during the first pill testing trial in Australia at Canberra’s Groovin the Moo last year showed that only 18 percent of festival-goers would decide not to take a drug which returned an adverse test result.  State governments should continue to enforce the law and reject pill-testing proposals.

Source: Australian Christian Lobby

Print This Post Print This Post



By Australian Newsletter

A blog written by Martin Iles Managing Director of the Australian Christian Lobby

When I was very young, I watched Disney’s Aladdin. From that day, I’d often speculate about what I’d ask the genie in the lamp if I ever found him. How could I eke maximum benefit out of just three wishes? Could I phrase my wishes in such a way as to get more wishes? Or perhaps some infinite benefit out of what appeared to be a single wish? My mind was abuzz with options. Of course, I’d never ask for a million dollars or some specific amount of money. I’d ask for a wallet that never stopped dispensing money – hah! Yes! Clever! Pity the fool who didn’t think of that!

It was around this time that I read the story of Solomon. God gave him one wish which would be His command. Wisdom. Solomon’s request deeply impacted me. It impacted me not merely because of what he asked for, though that was part of it, but also why he asked for it. First, it was because he was humble. He knew that he didn’t know. He knew that he was not equipped to discern and understand the realities of this world. He confessed that he was “a little child” concerning the task that lay before him. But secondly, he identified the particular reality of this world concerning which he would need the most profound help, “to discern between good and evil.”

He wanted wisdom in order to know what was right and what was wrong. This is a key application of wisdom in today’s world because that which is wrong is so often cloaked in what seems right. The deceitfulness of sin means we are sitting ducks without training in godly discernment, insight, understanding and wisdom. We need wisdom when it comes to people, for example. We have all known people who present admirably, but after time, years perhaps, their true colours are finally exposed. Maybe they were never the person we thought they were. Maybe you feel sick to discover they are a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

God’s own advice rings true, “The heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked. Who can know it?” [Jer 17:9] We also need wisdom when it comes to judging ideas. I wrote some time ago about self-esteem, self-worth, inner beauty and identity. So many Christians have hitched their wagons to those buzzwords in recent decades. And now we stand back, wondering why a generation filled with affirmation and ideas of their own empowerment are seduced by a postmodern worldview. Of course they are, it just plays to the script they’ve already heard, taking it one step further. A step we did not foresee, for lack of wisdom.

Telling a child how special they were seemed harmless enough. But too often we fail to discern the deeper foundations behind ideas. The attractive, surface veneer of that which is wrong fools us. Again, we need so much wisdom. But my call today is not primarily for wisdom in relation to people or ideas, but for wisdom in discerning agendas and understanding the path they lead us down. I am reminded of two seemingly good causes being pushed in the public square which have a dark underbelly. One is the reform of legislation to prevent gay students being expelled from religious schools.

The second is the effort to outlaw so-called “LGBTQ conversion therapy.” The recent release of the movie Boy Erased is the latest PR effort here, though media and political parties have been running a soft campaign for some time. Each of these sounds like something we could all support, but the devil is in the detail, or rather the underlying agenda. This is a call to wisdom. The religious schools’ reforms began with a straightforward lie. The Sydney Morning Herald claimed that the Ruddock Review recommended schools be able to expel students based on their sexuality. That was just not true.

But in this false claim was another idea simmering away: the idea that religious schools are expelling students simply because they are same-sex attracted. It turns out that is simply not true, either. There is, however, a section in the Sex Discrimination Act which would technically make this possible, so the debate quickly zeroed in on that. But that section is crucial to the protection of Christian schools, enabling them to operate according to their ethos. It allows them to uphold a Biblical sexual ethic in the conduct of their staff and student body, something which is surely in accord with the expectations of most parents who send their children to a Christian school.

It also includes a crucial protection which could enable a school to teach Biblical sexual ethics without falling foul of legal technicalities, or to refuse to teach Safe Schools-style programs without being accused of causing detriment to LGBTQ students. This is a seriously important matter. Many quickly stood on the landmine that had been laid to blow open this debate. But what is the actual objective? Is it about protecting gay kids from the persecution they suffer at the hands of religionists? No. It is about nothing less than the decimation of the freedom of our Christian schools; Nothing less than an attack on your ability to raise your children in accord with your moral values.

Meanwhile, the conversion therapy debate continues with the release of Boy Erased in theatres. It is the story of a young man whose devoutly Christian parents force him to go to a bootcamp to knock the gay out of him. The practices are abusive, coercive, demeaning and wrong. To the average Australian, the emerging narrative is that conversion therapy based around coercion, electric shocks, bizarre rituals and other madness is alive and well. The term “conversion therapy” itself is enough to conjure up a nightmare. But that is a lie. It’s not happening. The more subtle idea is that this has been a mainstream practice in Christianity in the past. But that is not true, either.

I do not deny that this happened to some, including the boy around which the movie is based. I do not deny that it is tragic, and it should be condemned. I condemn it. But I don’t think I know a Christian who would have experience with any such practices. Overwhelmingly, we couldn’t even have imagined them. Certainly, I know that they are not a problem in 2018 Australia. And yet there is a vigorous push on to outlaw so-called “LGBTQ conversion therapy.” Why? Because the laws that are being proposed use the name “conversion therapy” to capture more than what we see in Boy Erased.

Activists believe that a major oppressor of LGBTQ young people are their parents with Christian moral values. The mere teaching of those values is enough to cause harm to a vulnerable LGBTQ child and therefore ought to be stopped. So “conversion therapy” really comes to mean anything less than positive affirmation of a child’s felt gender identity of sexual orientation at any given time. It could become “conversion therapy” to affirm your male child as a boy if he feels like he might be a girl after speaking with the school counsellor. It could become “conversion therapy” to uphold a Biblical sexual ethic in the family home.

The laws which enshrine the outlawing of conversion therapy are nothing less than an excuse for the long arm of the government to reach into homes and label Christian parents “domestic and psychological abusers” (words taken from the Australian Labor Party’s conversion therapy policy). They would also prevent pastors, counsellors, and other Christian professionals from teaching the truth that change comes through Christ; the very gospel itself. This is perhaps one of the most insidious political agendas at work today, and yet it presents as totally compassionate.

It is no wonder that Solomon later wrote: Wisdom is the principal thing; Therefore get wisdom. And in all your getting, get understanding. [Prov 4:7] Let us be those who are wise, understanding the times in which we live, and discerning what is right and what is wrong in the agendas that are pushed all around us. Hebrews 5 calls us to become “those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.”

Source: Australian Christian Lobby

Print This Post Print This Post



By Australian Newsletter

Christians are being run out of business, hounded by boycotts and bullied by activists, for adhering to their faith a year after the celebrated same-sex-marriage vote.  In a sign Australia faces a “crisis of freedom”, a successful international wedding magazine that chose not to feature gay couples has announced its decision to shut down after becoming the target of an intimidation campaign.  The founders of White magazine, Christians Luke and Carla Burrell, said they were the targets of an activist campaign that deterred their advertisers, frightened their staff and included threats of physical harm because of their stand on same-sex weddings.

The couple, who have published White for 12 years, said the campaign was triggered by the same-sex marriage vote and saw them branded homophobes and bigots.  One individual warned their house would be burned down.  With the government poised to respond to a  review into religious freedoms amid concern gay school students and teachers will be subject to discrimination, the Burrells expressed deep frustration that activists had forced them to “draw the curtain on this part of our lives”.  “A number of advertisers withdrew their sponsorship out of fear of being judged, or in protest.  We have had to recognise that White magazine is no longer economically viable.’’

In another case, Christian photographer Jason Tey was taken to the West Australian Equal Opportunity Commission after agreeing to photograph the children of a same-sex couple but disclosed a conflict of belief, in case they felt more comfortable hiring someone else.  At the conciliation hearing, Mr Tey was ordered to provide an admission of discrimination and place a written apology on his website  homepage and all social media pages associated with his business for at least two months. Mr Tey, said: “I don’t believe I have discriminated in any way, nor offered unfavourable treatment.  I merely stated that I have a contrary view due to my Christian faith.”

The matter was not resolved at conciliation and was referred to the State Administrative Tribunal for mediation. Martyn Iles, managing director of the Australian Christian Lobby who helped establish the Human Rights Law Alliance, said the two cases were “the tip of the iceberg” that represented “a far deeper crisis of freedom”.  He warned that Australians with traditional views on marriage, gender and family were now in “direct contradiction to new laws” and said he was “imploring the government to pass high quality religious freedom laws”.  “We have assisted some 50 people who have come under legal persecution simply for what they believe,” he said.

“These cases demonstrate the intolerance shown towards those whose beliefs conflict with the new normal.  Jason is being sued simply for stating his beliefs. Luke and Carla were harassed out of business for saying and doing nothing.  We are at the stage where anything less than total affirmation is worthy of vicious attack.”  One of the recommendations of the review into religious freedoms, led by former  attorney-general Philip Ruddock, is for a religious discrimination act.  This would reframe the legal protections for religious freedoms as a positive right rather than continuing to have them enshrined as a negative right by way of exemptions to the Sex Discrimination Act.

The current system of exemptions, strengthened by Labor in 2013, allows faith-based institutions the ability to discriminate in certain circumstances, an arrangement that triggered a public backlash in the lead-up to last year’s Wentworth by-election.  Attorney-General Christian Porter will take the proposal for a religious discrimination act to cabinet for approval, but it is unclear whether the proposal will have enough support to pass the parliament.  White was published quarterly and, at its peak, had a circulation of about 32,000 copies and was available in 17 countries.  It had a small staff with one full-time employee in addition to Mr and Mrs Burrell.

In August, stories broke in the mainstream media identifying that White did not feature gay couples, with photographer Lara Hotz arguing it was an unspoken policy that should be made clear.  Ms Hotz, whose images had featured in the magazine, said at the time she felt discriminated against.  The 32-year-old said she had also received numerous threats after posting about the magazine’s policy.  “I fully support religious freedom,” Ms Hotz said.  “But this was simply a request for White magazine to be transparent with their advertisers and contributors so they could make informed decisions.”

Source:  Compiled by APN from media reports

Print This Post Print This Post



By Australian Newsletter

“There is something sinister going on in Australian classrooms.  The “cultural left” is using political correctness to control how students think about everything from post-colonial theory to maths and science,” Kevin Donnelly, a senior research fellow at the Australian Catholic University said at the launch of his new book, How Political Correctness is Destroying Education and Your Child’s Future.  “Political correctness is also visible in the Acknowledgement of Country, commonly used to pay respect to the traditional Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander owners of the land, which should be accompanied by a prayer,” former prime minister Tony Abbott said.

“Recently I went to the opening of the new Northern Beaches Hospital and there was a formal welcome to country.  Every single speaker, and there were about six of them, acknowledged country, fair enough, but there was not a single prayer, even though our society is absolutely unimaginable without the influence of Christianity,” Mr Abbott said.  There is also a lack of religious and cultural teachings in schools, Mr Abbott said at the launch of the book, which is a follow-up to Dr Donnelly’s earlier book, How Political Correctness Is Destroying Australia – Enemies Within and Without, released in June last year.

“It’s not enough to be able to read, write, count and think, there needs to be a cultural literacy that everyone coming through an Australian education should have,” Mr Abbott said.  “That means a familiarity with the gospel stories, especially the parables, which have done so much to shape our culture.  And this is not a question of trying to ram religious faith down people’s throats, it’s a matter of giving people the knowledge essential to understand the culture in which they live.  “I am all in favour of Asian, environmental and Indigenous perspectives, but are these really the top priorities which should permeate every aspect of our curriculum? I doubt it very much indeed.”

Dr Donnelly’s new book argues for the need to preserve Western culture.  “It argues that mathematics, physics, science, all social constructs, have no inherent meaning or value,” said Dr Donnelly, who was a co-chair of the 2014 Australian Curriculum review.  “And if they’re constructs they can be reshaped, deconstructed, remodelled in terms of the cultural left’s ideology, so you now have Aboriginal science being put into the national curriculum.”  Dr Donnelly is referring to recommendations for teachers to incorporate Aboriginal culture and history when covering existing science topics in a bid to increase the accessibility of the subject and close the gap.

What we need, Dr Donnelly said, is a return to 1950s Australia, where things were less complicated and children were happier.  “Some people talk about political correctness as being polite and as being civil and that for many years we discriminated unfairly,” Dr Donnelly said. “Now all of that is true… [but] we used to run around as kids, happy as Larry, free-range, no helicopter parents, doing all kinds of dodgy stuff.  “No one had heard of multiculturalism or diversity and difference, no one had heard of identity politics or micro-aggression.  We were kids growing up in Australia in the 1950s or 60s.”

Abbott continued “We were all equal, we were all proud of who we were, but how times have changed.”  Mr Abbott also had some advice for state and territory education authorities on how to arrest Australia’s fall in international rankings such as PISA and TIMMS, including raising entry requirements for teaching degrees and increasing pay.  “We need to focus on better acknowledging and rewarding the very best teachers, and the best teachers of senior subjects, even at a state school, should be paid at least as much as a backbench member of parliament” Mr Abbott said.

Source: Compiled by APN from media reports

Print This Post Print This Post



By Australian Newsletter

Underlying the sharp rise of cricketer Marnus Labuschagne, the gritty, batting all-rounder, is a lifelong faith in God.  In October Marnus made a surprise entry into the Test cricket scene, debuting against Pakistan.  He’s since shown promise with the bat and ball though it’s his hard working demeanour that is setting him apart.  Coaches and peers have seen a great amount of character and potential in the 24 year old as the team looks to reshape its ethos stemming from the ball tampering saga last March and the resulting Cricket Australia Culture Review.

“It does give me perspective on things.  That cricket isn’t everything.” Labuschagne said “His work ethic is as good as anyone’s.” says Australian coach Justin Langer.  “He’s one of those guys who is like the heartbeat of the team in terms of work ethic, desire, focus.”  After what’s been a whirlwind four months for the regular Gateway Baptist Church attendee, Manus spoke with about the role of his faith in his cricket and life.  “I’ve been a Christian my whole life,” he says.  “I grew up going to church, and I made my own commitment to follow the Lord when I was 17, when I got baptised at my church, and it’s been a journey since then.

Unfortunately he was unable to retain his spot in the test team against India.  Despite the promising start to his international career he notes the balance church and faith provides him when cricket doesn’t go as planned.  “It gives me perspective on things.  That cricket isn’t everything.  Although at times it feels like it has become that.  I know when I come back from wherever I have been, I’m coming into an environment where I’m loved.  My faith has played a massive part these past few months.”  Labuschagne is very open about his faith, even displaying a small Isaiah 40:31 sticker on the back of his bat though he’ll admit it’s not something he has always found easy to share.

“It’s definitely something where earlier, when I came into an ageing Queensland State Team and everyone knew I was Christian, that was a bit more challenging,” he says.  “There were older players and it was a bit tougher.  But people were willing to listen and try to understand me.”  Despite some preconceptions, his faith is very much now viewed by team mates as part of who he his is as a person.  It has opened up a number of interactions with teammates keen to learn more about this side of him including Australia’s only practicing Muslim cricketer, Usman Khawaja.”

“Usman and I have had numerous conversations about faith. Even from when I first came into the squad, we’ve had some amazing conversations, about his faith, my faith, and how they sort of intertwine” Labuschagne said.   2019 is set to be an exciting year for the young cricketer.  He’s re-earned his place in the side and with the Ashes coming up in August Ricky Ponting has already backed him to receive a plane ticket to England.  Whatever happens though he will always have his faith in something much bigger than cricket.

Source: Hope 103.2 Radio Station

Print This Post Print This Post